Almost a week at work, and since ostensibly this blog is about the Institute of Educational Technology as we run up to review, I guess I should put something in about what I’ve been up to. A few highlights to get us up to date…
We started the week with IET Committee, which was pretty busy, what with the review, new courses and the move to the new building and all. IET committee brings together members of the Institute with representatives from the faculties and other units such as the Library and KMi, as well as our Associate Lecturers. It is the body that authorises the Director of IET to proceed with the Institute’s business (better pay attention then, eh? J). The new management structure was presented and approved, as were the two new courses. H800 is the new backbone for the Master’s course, so is a key development; H810 is an innovative collaboration with TechDis, who are providing us with curriculum around the topic of accessibility.
On Tuesday there was Academic Promotions committee, where we considered the updated CVs of all non-professorial academic and research staff to give advice about promotions or awards – or even advice about how to write a CV! This process will run for a bit longer, as, due to illness, we didn’t have everyone we needed to complete the activity.
When I became Acting Director I joined a group convened by my predecessor, Peter Knight, called ‘How shall we teach in 2012?’. This group meets periodically for lunch to discuss the topic, and expand our thinking. Much is changing on campus at the moment (this will be a recurring theme!), in particular the Student Support Review, the developments in the VLE, new PVC, ELQ etc. Wondering to whom we should be reporting, the group had been experiencing a ‘crise’, thrown into sharp relief by recent events. Denise Kirkpatrick had commissioned a workshop entitled ‘Think tank for vision of Higher Education 2012’ to provide a view of what OU staff think will be important in the future, to feed into discussions with Microsoft. She had asked me to run the workshop, which I did. Many of the members of the 2012 group were invited, and several attended. So the question was: is that it? Should we wind up the group? Were we just turning into a cosy lunch club? Luckily, we’ve decided to give ourselves one more chance. We’ll use the output of the workshop and see if we can push forward one more time – and if we are still unsure, then we’ll wind up (Christina, you’re such a hard task master!).
Wednesday was partly spent organising a national workshop for the UKCRC/BCS Grand Challenges in Computing No. 8: Learning for Life. This workshop will run before the main Grand Challenges ’08 conference in London on 18/19 March 2008. I convene and chair the Learning for Life Grand Challenge, and I’m pleased to have the opportunity to move us forward on developing a roadmap for the research.
Today, Thursday, the issue of the moment was scholarship. The OU is taking stock post-RAE to consider how to support all staff in developing their scholarly activities. The RAE created some bad feeling around the notion of some staff seeming to be designated ‘research active’ which was understood to mean ‘included in the RAE’. This left staff who were not designated research active feeling that they were regarded as lesser citizens in some way. I do not believe this is a correct interpretation of the situation, but I can see how and why this perception came about. Perhaps one of the only benefits of the move towards the research excellence framework (aka metrics) is that this invidious division should largely disappear. Publications, in principle, will stand or fall by their merits, and if we tried really hard at national level, we could have scholarship and research excellence measured by the same kinds of metrics. We might then be in a position to exemplify Boyer’s statement:
“The arrow of causality can, and frequently does, point in both directions. Theory surely leads to practice. But practice also leads to theory. Teaching, at its best, shapes both research and practice”.
Working with my Deputy Director Linda Price, I have been considering how the Institute can support staff in the OU who will need support in their scholarship activities. Linda is a member of the CASTl group (Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning) and has been developing a workshop. The OU is running a teaching and learning conference in April, and, to some extent, we wait for this event to announce a new strategy for scholarship. However, we feel that putting together some resources now will stand us in good stead for when the faculties begin to engage with this wholesale. We are looking at developing a companion site for scholarship to sit alongside the EPD website. If approved, this could be announced at the conference. Let’s see how it goes…